Scientific approach
While other systems have self-assessment tests or one person typing another. They may be wrong or right. Who knows… There is no falsifiable statement.
OP is different, there is no test. The person's subjective point of view doesn't matter.
In OP at least two operators type a third person independently without influencing each other. Thanks to use of AI, we can provide you with more accurate results much faster, and cheaper. You just need to express yourself, talk about your life, your thoughts, your feelings, and we'll do the rest.
Typing people with scientific rigour results in empirical evidence.
What's important to the observers?
What is obvious to you?
Whatnbsp;are you obligated to do?
What are you responsible for?
What do you try to avoid?
What are you not obligated to do?
What would you like to delegate?
What would you like to do once and never ever again?
Compared to other people, what is the person doing more/less than average?
Why is it valid?
Operators guess other operators' guesses, hence it is testable and falsifiable. Do we get the same result? Yes or No.
Inter-rater Reliability.
Can two independent raters agree on their assessments?
Yes, people get very similar results. 90% agreement.
Right type = predictability.
When do we know that we typed someone right?
When we can predict his answers, struggles, preferences and life discoveries.
This ships personality typing from something speculative, opinion-based, and subjective, to something objective that can be systematised and replicated.
What is the result?
OP.ai uses 9 binary coins, you can be either A or B, this equals in 512 types!
The probability of independently finding the same type is 1 : 512 n where n is the number of operators.
In future we will add 4 more coins, so the number of types will increase exponentially!
Example result:
People of the same type share:
- Biggest fears, triggers, life struggles
- Obvious solutions to problems
- Life lessons, discoveries, TED-talk main theme
But also:
- Facial features
- Disorders
- Health problems
- Sexual preferences
- OP claim to track genetics
Saviors & Demons
Saviors
Saviors are Obligated to, unaware addiction to, responsible for, downplays, sees as the solution, life pile, better than most people at. The more dominant a Function is, the more we use it and don't even realize it. Your Saviors are “so real” that you don't even stop to see them. Every time you talk or write an email, there are many Functions you are NOT doing. Your predictable life cycle is because you are addictively overdoing your Savior Functions , neglecting and blaming your Demons, and not seeing it. Saviors are what you are actually doing all day, what you are responsible for, what you cannot stop doing, even if you can't see them. Saviors have nothing to do with what you “like” or “want”. Some people love to eat junk food all day and others hate that they have the same bad habit. For example, the Savior Oe will tell you that they “love and want” control. Yet, they are NOT doing it. They are not the one, when compared to 100 other people, that is ACTUALLY controlling information and shoving away new. Our Saviors are what we are doing way too much of which is what is causing all of our recurring life tidalwaves to repeat (the build up of the neglected Demons). It is our theory that the mind will switch your S/D interpretations in order to protect your fake-self-story from collapsing.
- Responsible, obvious, obligated, possessed by — “I'm responsible, so I spend my time on this.”
- Confidence — “I can work through the struggles here.”
- Obvious — “Let me just do that for you, thank me later.”
- Actually doing, may or may not see it or like it
- What is being piled up and done more than others
- All recurring problems come from overdoing this
- Because people spend the majority of their day in their Saviors, they can manage the ups and downs there.
Demons
Demons are Avoiding, blaming, desiring, showing off, someday will have, forces this void on others. The more dominant the Savior Function is, the more the other side of that coin is unconscious of and blamed. We strongly see that people don't just kind of “not prefer” their inferior side, they actually demonize it. This is the strongest driving, most predictable force in ones life. We are able to objectively type people because we are just looking at what they are overdoing (Saviors) and what they are running from (Demons) . For example, the Savior Di person will see themselves as so caring and giving to the tribe (even though they obviously are not). They then have no idea why everyone has packed up against them. The Di then doubles down and goes all in on their way and getting away from the tribe. It is our theory that Evolution wants us blind and delusional so we cause problems (by blaming and neglecting our Demons) and then run in and save everyone with our Saviors. If humans were balanced and peaceful, we wouldn't fight (and therefore quickly die off). There has to be a “bad guy” in life in order for us to be motivated to move. This is why, as you get older, no matter where you go, those same recurring tidalwaves are still stalking you.
- Blame, ignorance, awkward, run away from
- Dreams about, desires, someday, would like to be
- Void that is being left for others to do
- All recurring problems come from neglecting this
- Tidal waves — “I'm not responsible, someone else is.”
- Fear/Pain — “Why does this keep happening to me?”
- Peacocking — “I secretly want to be good at this.”
- Because people spend only a small portion of their day in their Demons, there is no mastery there and they'll show it in their emotions.
OP Coins
O or D
Di or De
Oi or Oe
N or S
F or T
Sleep or Play
Consume or Blast
Info or Energy dominant
I or E
(In future) Flex (Self-motivated) or Friends (Tribe-motivated)
(In future) Generalisation or Specialisation
(In future) Feminine sensory or Masculine sensory
(In future) Feminine De or Masculine De